Why Cloud Consumers Need “Objective” Application Performance Management
July 12, 2013

Jim Young
IBM

Share this

The long anticipated rise of cloud computing is finally taking hold, with analysts reporting more investment in public clouds than private clouds, and suggesting that half of all production applications will be running on public clouds in three or four years.

The allure of public clouds springs from advantages like improved service scalability, reduced operational costs, and an increased focus on business goals and strategies instead of the technology needed to pursue them. However, there is a cost to that flexibility and economy, in reduced visibility of application and infrastructure health. Without direct control over the cloud infrastructure itself, traditional application performance management (APM) tools may prove impractical to deploy and manage.

I recently read a story about a war of words between a leading platform as a service vendor and a disgruntled customer, who discovered that they weren’t actually getting the amount of virtual computing capacity that they had been told they were getting.

Putting aside the customer’s justifiable indignation at not getting the resources that they believed they were paying for, the real story for a cloud consumer here (or an APM Product Manager) is that the tools they were using to monitor their workloads didn’t really provide them with a complete story. Then, when the continued mystery warranted a deeper-dive tool, it appears that they were pressured or influenced into purchasing a particular cloud APM tool because of a relationship between that tool vendor and the PaaS provider.

This suggests (and logic supports) that customers are better off using objective APM tools when monitoring workloads on public clouds, whether those workloads are running on a Platform as a Service (PaaS) solution like Heroku, or an Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) solution like Amazon or Rackspace.

We generally espouse such a practice to help a customer maintain a posture of portability, so they can nimbly move workloads around to different cloud platforms, yet maintain continuity in their real-time and historical view of application health, without having to train their eyes on a new health dashboard whenever they move their workloads. We can employ the slightly suspicious sounding argument that a customer should not necessarily rely on his service provider for monitoring tools, since that provider has a vested interest in painting a rosy picture. Even in the presence of SLAs, a cloud tenant with no access to the infrastructure is somewhat at the mercy of his provider for performance reporting. An APM solution that the customer can deploy and configure himself provides a level of “checks and balances” oversight.

It can be impractical for customers to deploy legacy monitoring tools when moving to public clouds, so there is a need for a solution that can be deployed within those public clouds, in their own little sphere of control where their application VMs reside. By adopting an elastic and scalable ­yet small and easy to deploy architecture, as well as the ability to embed additional monitoring technology into base VM images, this solution enables robust APM, even when users can only deploy simple Linux VMs to someone else's cloud.

Jim Young is Information Development Manager, IBM Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure

Related Links:

www.ibm.com

Information Development Manager, IBM Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure
Share this

The Latest

May 22, 2017

APMdigest asked experts across the industry for their opinions on the next steps for ITOA. Part 5 offers some interesting final thoughts ...

May 19, 2017

APMdigest asked experts across the industry for their opinions on the next steps for ITOA. Part 4 covers automation and the dynamic IT environment ...

May 18, 2017

APMdigest asked experts across the industry for their opinions on the next steps for ITOA. Part 3 covers monitoring and user experience ...

May 17, 2017

APMdigest asked experts across the industry for their opinions on the next steps for ITOA. Part 2 covers visibility and data ...

May 16, 2017

Managing application performance today requires analytics. IT Operations Analytics (ITOA) is often used to augment or built into Application Performance Management solutions to process the massive amounts of metrics coming out of today's IT environment. But today ITOA stands at a crossroads as revolutionary technologies and capabilities are emerging to push it into new realms. So where is ITOA going next? With this question in mind, APMdigest asked experts across the industry — including analysts, consultants and vendors — for their opinions on the next steps for ITOA ...

May 15, 2017

Digital transformation initiatives are more successful when they have buy-in from across the business, according to a new report titled Digital Transformation Trailblazing: A Data-Driven Approach ...

May 11, 2017

The growing market for analytics in IT is one of the more exciting areas to watch in the technology industry. Exciting because of the variety and types of vendor innovation in this area. And exciting as well because our research indicates the adoption of advanced IT analytics supports data sharing and joint decision making in a way that's catalytic for both IT and digital transformation ...

May 10, 2017

Colin Fletcher, Research Director at Gartner, talks about Algorithmic IT Operations (AIOps) and the challenges and recommendations for AIOps adoption ...

May 09, 2017

In APMdigest's exclusive interview, Colin Fletcher, Research Director at Gartner, talks about Algorithmic IT Operations (AIOps) and how it will impact ITOA and APM ...

May 05, 2017

Microsoft is expected to essentially wind down Windows 7 support by 2020 so inevitably Windows 10 will be on the IT task list. It would be beneficial, now, to examine some of the issues relating to migrating to Windows 10 OS and how these pain points can be alleviated and addressed. Here are 7 practices that are key to facilitating migration ...