According to eMarketer, as of 2014 Americans consume more media using mobile devices than laptops and desktops combined. This shift in consumer behavior is also occurring within corporations, as employees increasingly rely on mobile devices for their work.
With such a surge in mobile usage there is a growing need for corporations to ensure that their mobile experience is high quality and not broken.
Since 86% of mobile experiences occur within apps and not mobile browsers [source: Flurry], focusing on improving app performance has a larger impact on mobile quality.
The following are 4 key differences that companies monitoring their server (and website) performance should consider when selecting a mobile app performance monitoring solution.
1. Different Team, Different Needs
At most companies, mobile teams are not part of the server/website teams. Instead mobile teams are completely separate and in many cases they are an outsourced team.
The mobile teams have unique pain points when releasing mobile apps that are different from those of web and backend developers (more on this below). Solutions that slightly tweak the interface of a server performance monitoring service do not cut it. These teams require solutions designed from the ground up to solve their problems.
2. Scaling vs. Fragmentation Challenge
Developers on server teams face scaling problems. When a website or backend developer writes a line of code they need to ensure that it performs well as traffic grows and lots of users hit that code.
On the other hand developers on mobile teams face fragmentation problems. When a mobile developer writes a line of code they need to ensure that it will run well on thousands of device configurations, including varying device types, connection types, and OS versions.
A recent study by OpenSignal found that there are over 18,000 types of Android devices. How does a mobile developer confirm that their app code doesn’t break across all these devices? There is only one way, monitor production performance using a service that makes it easy to slide and dice the live performance.
3. Network vs. Device Performance
Server teams are primarily concerned with network performance. When the network is slow the bits don’t get downloaded to the thin client, usually a browser, and the end user suffers.
Mobile teams however are concerned with much more than just the network performance; they are dealing with low-end devices running their evolving client code base.
Unique challenges for mobile app developers include:
- How smooth are the interactions (e.g. scrolling)?
- Are apps hitting memory limits on certain devices hurting the user experience?
- Are users on lower end devices waiting an unreasonable amount of time for calculations to finish?
- Is the app draining the battery at an unreasonable rate?
A performance solution for mobile developers needs to be much more comprehensive in the type of metrics captured, and go beyond simply reporting on network issues.
4. Greater Variability of User Experiences
Unlike desktops and laptops, which are high-powered devices often used indoors on reliable networks, mobile devices have more chaotic environments with a wide range of capabilities running on top of unreliable networks.
Since mobile has more variability, performance monitoring solutions need to remove noise from the data to make it usable. For example, the ability to slice and dice the data to view the data that matters, like performance in the US of the latest app version on older but popular handsets.
Mobile performance monitoring solutions should also provide the ability to handle noise introduced by outliers that distort the average performance. This can be addressed by metrics like 95th percentile performance, which are more representative of a slow experience, and 50th percentile performance, to better measure the typical experience.
Finally, noise is created by interrupted app sessions like answering a phone call in the middle of a session. Solutions that detect and handle interruptions present a clearer picture of true performance.
Summary
As users migrate to using mobile apps, businesses face a challenge ensuring the same high quality experiences provided on the Web. In selecting a mobile performance monitoring service to help discover and prioritize outstanding issues, businesses should consider the unique pain points their mobile teams face as outlined above.
ABOUT Ofer Ronen
Ofer Ronen is the Co-founder and CEO of Pulse.io, a performance monitoring service for mobile app developers. The service monitors over 400 monthly sessions for companies of all sizes. It is unique in the level of performance metrics reported, ensuring that issues are not missed. Ronen previously was CEO of Sendori (sold to IAC), a mobile and web ad network. He received a computer engineering MS/BS from Michigan, and MBA from Cornell.
The Latest
Broad proliferation of cloud infrastructure combined with continued support for remote workers is driving increased complexity and visibility challenges for network operations teams, according to new research conducted by Dimensional Research and sponsored by Broadcom ...
New research from ServiceNow and ThoughtLab reveals that less than 30% of banks feel their transformation efforts are meeting evolving customer digital needs. Additionally, 52% say they must revamp their strategy to counter competition from outside the sector. Adapting to these challenges isn't just about staying competitive — it's about staying in business ...
Leaders in the financial services sector are bullish on AI, with 95% of business and IT decision makers saying that AI is a top C-Suite priority, and 96% of respondents believing it provides their business a competitive advantage, according to Riverbed's Global AI and Digital Experience Survey ...
SLOs have long been a staple for DevOps teams to monitor the health of their applications and infrastructure ... Now, as digital trends have shifted, more and more teams are looking to adapt this model for the mobile environment. This, however, is not without its challenges ...
Modernizing IT infrastructure has become essential for organizations striving to remain competitive. This modernization extends beyond merely upgrading hardware or software; it involves strategically leveraging new technologies like AI and cloud computing to enhance operational efficiency, increase data accessibility, and improve the end-user experience ...
AI sure grew fast in popularity, but are AI apps any good? ... If companies are going to keep integrating AI applications into their tech stack at the rate they are, then they need to be aware of AI's limitations. More importantly, they need to evolve their testing regiment ...
If you were lucky, you found out about the massive CrowdStrike/Microsoft outage last July by reading about it over coffee. Those less fortunate were awoken hours earlier by frantic calls from work ... Whether you were directly affected or not, there's an important lesson: all organizations should be conducting in-depth reviews of testing and change management ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 11, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) ...
On average, only 48% of digital initiatives enterprise-wide meet or exceed their business outcome targets according to Gartner's annual global survey of CIOs and technology executives ...
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping industries around the world. From optimizing business processes to unlocking new levels of innovation, AI is a critical driver of success for modern enterprises. As a result, business leaders — from DevOps engineers to CTOs — are under pressure to incorporate AI into their workflows to stay competitive. But the question isn't whether AI should be adopted — it's how ...
