How Do I Assess the Quality of My External IT Supplier?
June 24, 2015

Coen Meerbeek
Blue Factory Internet

Share this

Given the extent to which companies are contracting out their IT organization to other parties, outsourcing appears to be making a comeback. But migrating your IT infrastructure and management to the cloud or another party remains a hot topic.

In the outsourcing procedure you lay down your criteria for the quality to be delivered by the other party. We have to do this, because otherwise the supplier will rest on his laurels, which is the last thing we want. So, we've got our criteria, but who's going to monitor them and how transparent are the figures?

An interesting subject to take a look at today.

As I mentioned above, the concept of outsourcing has changed a fair bit since the emergence of the cloud. We now have different levels of outsourcing.

1. The IT infrastructure runs at the supplier's premises but you remain responsible for the architecture, implementation and management. You also have the applications managed by your own people. (IaaS)

2. The IT infrastructure runs at the supplier's premises and the supplier is responsible for the architecture, implementation and management. You have the applications managed by your own people. (PaaS)

3. Both the IT infrastructure and the applications are the responsibility of the supplier. It makes no difference how everything has been designed. (SaaS)

The monitoring process is different for each of the three variants. What I regard as being most important here is:

■ To have all of the variants assessed by an independent party or by your own organisation. Under no circumstances should this be done by the supplier.

■ All of the assessments are carried out from the end-user's perspective. The best measure of the supplier's quality is the performance and availability that you as the buyer receive.

We can use the following solutions for the three variants. I've based this on pure SLA monitoring but also on the four data sets; wire, machine, agent and synthetic.

Variant 1 – Infrastructure-as-a-Service

The supplier is solely responsible for providing the hardware. You are responsible for its content. You will usually be responsible for everything from the virtualization level onwards.

In that case, the best way to monitor the supplier's service is to place the monitoring process at virtualization level. Splunk, for instance, has a superb VMWare app that provides you with all the information you need. I can well imagine that the supplier will not in all cases be willing to allow this. It will mean that he has to be transparent about the service he provides and it might be possible to pass on the monitoring data that he generates to your own Splunk implementation in order to draw up the right reports yourself.

Monitoring from infrastructure level is entirely your responsibility, so you can decide for yourself which tool to choose to cover four data sets. A synthetic solution remains desirable but cannot be used in respect of the supplier because he'll always say that there are other links between what he provides and the end-user and that he is not responsible for them.

Variant 2 – Platform-as-a-Service

In this variant, the supplier is responsible up to OS level. From that point onwards you are the owner who implements and manages the applications. In some cases the OS is also shielded and you are only able to implement the applications.

Monitoring the supplier's service directly affects the performance and availability of your applications, and for that reason it's advisable to implement a synthetic monitor. You can supplement this with a process that monitors the availability of the OS if you are able to influence this. In this case a simple Ping monitor will suffice.

You can synthetically add agent or machine data in order to cover all of the data sets. Wire data is an attractive option in the application area, but not at infrastructure level. To do this you will need to know a lot about how the infrastructure is set up, and that's precisely what you wanted to outsource.

Variant 3 – Software-as-a-Service

The supplier arranges everything. You are only the user of the application that you want to buy. The supplier will usually have published his own SLA, but how transparent is it?

The best bet here is to chose a synthetic solution yourself and have it assessed independently. Use these figures to check the quality of the service and to confront the supplier with results other than what have been agreed.

To conclude ...

Outsourcing is based on trust but to many companies IT is a matter of life or death: it's importance is inestimable. You want to avoid a situation where finger-pointing starts between you and the supplier if faults occur. Make sure that you give careful thought to monitoring quality also during the implementation of the outsourcing.

How have you experienced this as a user? How do you monitor your outsourcing contracts, and what were your experiences with an outsourcing party? I'd like to hear your experiences - I can learn from them too.

Coen Meerbeek is an Online Performance Consultant at Blue Factory Internet.

Share this

The Latest

November 21, 2024

Broad proliferation of cloud infrastructure combined with continued support for remote workers is driving increased complexity and visibility challenges for network operations teams, according to new research conducted by Dimensional Research and sponsored by Broadcom ...

November 20, 2024

New research from ServiceNow and ThoughtLab reveals that less than 30% of banks feel their transformation efforts are meeting evolving customer digital needs. Additionally, 52% say they must revamp their strategy to counter competition from outside the sector. Adapting to these challenges isn't just about staying competitive — it's about staying in business ...

November 19, 2024

Leaders in the financial services sector are bullish on AI, with 95% of business and IT decision makers saying that AI is a top C-Suite priority, and 96% of respondents believing it provides their business a competitive advantage, according to Riverbed's Global AI and Digital Experience Survey ...

November 18, 2024

SLOs have long been a staple for DevOps teams to monitor the health of their applications and infrastructure ... Now, as digital trends have shifted, more and more teams are looking to adapt this model for the mobile environment. This, however, is not without its challenges ...

November 14, 2024

Modernizing IT infrastructure has become essential for organizations striving to remain competitive. This modernization extends beyond merely upgrading hardware or software; it involves strategically leveraging new technologies like AI and cloud computing to enhance operational efficiency, increase data accessibility, and improve the end-user experience ...

November 13, 2024

AI sure grew fast in popularity, but are AI apps any good? ... If companies are going to keep integrating AI applications into their tech stack at the rate they are, then they need to be aware of AI's limitations. More importantly, they need to evolve their testing regiment ...

November 12, 2024

If you were lucky, you found out about the massive CrowdStrike/Microsoft outage last July by reading about it over coffee. Those less fortunate were awoken hours earlier by frantic calls from work ... Whether you were directly affected or not, there's an important lesson: all organizations should be conducting in-depth reviews of testing and change management ...

November 08, 2024

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 11, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) ...

November 07, 2024

On average, only 48% of digital initiatives enterprise-wide meet or exceed their business outcome targets according to Gartner's annual global survey of CIOs and technology executives ...

November 06, 2024

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping industries around the world. From optimizing business processes to unlocking new levels of innovation, AI is a critical driver of success for modern enterprises. As a result, business leaders — from DevOps engineers to CTOs — are under pressure to incorporate AI into their workflows to stay competitive. But the question isn't whether AI should be adopted — it's how ...