Skip to main content

Stop Separating Mobile App Security from Performance

Michael Olechna
Guardsquare

There's an image problem with mobile app security. While it's critical for highly regulated industries like financial services, it is often overlooked in others. This usually comes down to development priorities, which typically fall into three categories: user experience, app performance, and app security. When dealing with finite resources such as time, shifting priorities, and team skill sets, engineering teams often have to prioritize one over the others. Usually, security is the odd man out.

Image
Guardsquare

 

Mobile app security's undeserved reputation as a secondary concern stems from several factors. For one, it has a stigma of being difficult to implement. After all, mobile developers specialize in building fast, reliable applications, while security engineering is an entirely separate discipline requiring specialized expertise. This "security skills gap" makes mobile app security inaccessible for many development teams. It also presents additional challenges when scaling mobile app development.

As an app scales, mobile development teams introduce greater complexity and functionality. This often happens through the popular and accessible scaling method of adding third-party SDK libraries. But more risk is being introduced to the application by importing these libraries. While these libraries help accelerate development, they also introduce risk, making mobile app protection even more critical.

At this point, mobile app security can no longer be ignored. A DIY approach may seem like a viable option, as it allows teams to tailor security measures to their needs without inflating app size. Open-source tools exist to help optimize the size of the app, but they require experienced security engineers to implement sufficient protections. Developers without security expertise will have difficulty implementing effective protections, leaving the scalability problem unresolved. This means teams are still forced to compromise between performance, security, and UX.

Weaving in multiple layers of code-hardening and obfuscation techniques at the code level provides the robust protection that DIY solutions cannot.

So, what's the best approach?

The answer is to stop thinking about security and performance as separate concerns.

Security and Mobile App Development Should Go Hand in Hand

A winning mobile app security strategy integrates security throughout the development lifecycle. Security must be a consideration at every stage — from writing the code to testing its effectiveness to monitoring threats in real time post-release.

When building your application, efficiency is key to a timely release. But it is also critical to write efficient, secure code. For example, Android apps need to optimize their Java code and resources. Secure coding practices inherently improve efficiency. Removing logging code, eliminating dead code, and code shrinking are examples of a few efficient coding practices that also increase mobile application security. Merging classes and method inlining are other secure coding practices that help shrink the overall size of a mobile application. Mobile apps can apply this to resources in the code as well. Resource shrinking and obfuscation will reduce application size and improve security.

These techniques not only have the potential to reduce application size but also enhance security. With the proper tools, mobile apps can shrink in size by as much as 70% and increase speed by 20%. Incorporating these practices will create an efficient, high performing application that is well protected against malicious threats.

Post-Release - Continuous Threat Monitoring

After publishing your app, continuous threat monitoring will provide ongoing insights and protection by identifying threats to your app in real-time. Security teams monitoring your mobile application receive metadata like app builds, device type, and geographic location with each threat, along with details about each detected threat. Sharing this data with security and development teams gives them the data they need to build proactive protections against new and evolving threats, while helping to mitigate future risks.

Developers and security experts are both essential to building and executing this strategy together. By embedding security into the development process, you can create a high-performing, secure, and scalable app without compromise.

Stop compromising between app performance, user experience, and security. Deliver a superior user experience and a high performing application by incorporating security into your development process. 

Michael Olechna is Product Marketing Manager at Guardsquare

Hot Topics

The Latest

As artificial intelligence (AI) adoption gains momentum, network readiness is emerging as a critical success factor. AI workloads generate unpredictable bursts of traffic, demanding high-speed connectivity that is low latency and lossless. AI adoption will require upgrades and optimizations in data center networks and wide-area networks (WANs). This is prompting enterprise IT teams to rethink, re-architect, and upgrade their data center and WANs to support AI-driven operations ...

Artificial intelligence (AI) is core to observability practices, with some 41% of respondents reporting AI adoption as a core driver of observability, according to the State of Observability for Financial Services and Insurance report from New Relic ...

Application performance monitoring (APM) is a game of catching up — building dashboards, setting thresholds, tuning alerts, and manually correlating metrics to root causes. In the early days, this straightforward model worked as applications were simpler, stacks more predictable, and telemetry was manageable. Today, the landscape has shifted, and more assertive tools are needed ...

Cloud adoption has accelerated, but backup strategies haven't always kept pace. Many organizations continue to rely on backup strategies that were either lifted directly from on-prem environments or use cloud-native tools in limited, DR-focused ways ... Eon uncovered a handful of critical gaps regarding how organizations approach cloud backup. To capture these prevailing winds, we gathered insights from 150+ IT and cloud leaders at the recent Google Cloud Next conference, which we've compiled into the 2025 State of Cloud Data Backup ...

Private clouds are no longer playing catch-up, and public clouds are no longer the default as organizations recalibrate their cloud strategies, according to the Private Cloud Outlook 2025 report from Broadcom. More than half (53%) of survey respondents say private cloud is their top priority for deploying new workloads over the next three years, while 69% are considering workload repatriation from public to private cloud, with one-third having already done so ...

As organizations chase productivity gains from generative AI, teams are overwhelmingly focused on improving delivery speed (45%) over enhancing software quality (13%), according to the Quality Transformation Report from Tricentis ...

Back in March of this year ... MongoDB's stock price took a serious tumble ... In my opinion, it reflects a deeper structural issue in enterprise software economics altogether — vendor lock-in ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 15, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses Do-It-Yourself Network Automation ... 

Zero-day vulnerabilities — security flaws that are exploited before developers even know they exist — pose one of the greatest risks to modern organizations. Recently, such vulnerabilities have been discovered in well-known VPN systems like Ivanti and Fortinet, highlighting just how outdated these legacy technologies have become in defending against fast-evolving cyber threats ... To protect digital assets and remote workers in today's environment, companies need more than patchwork solutions. They need architecture that is secure by design ...

Traditional observability requires users to leap across different platforms or tools for metrics, logs, or traces and related issues manually, which is very time-consuming, so as to reasonably ascertain the root cause. Observability 2.0 fixes this by unifying all telemetry data, logs, metrics, and traces into a single, context-rich pipeline that flows into one smart platform. But this is far from just having a bunch of additional data; this data is actionable, predictive, and tied to revenue realization ...

Stop Separating Mobile App Security from Performance

Michael Olechna
Guardsquare

There's an image problem with mobile app security. While it's critical for highly regulated industries like financial services, it is often overlooked in others. This usually comes down to development priorities, which typically fall into three categories: user experience, app performance, and app security. When dealing with finite resources such as time, shifting priorities, and team skill sets, engineering teams often have to prioritize one over the others. Usually, security is the odd man out.

Image
Guardsquare

 

Mobile app security's undeserved reputation as a secondary concern stems from several factors. For one, it has a stigma of being difficult to implement. After all, mobile developers specialize in building fast, reliable applications, while security engineering is an entirely separate discipline requiring specialized expertise. This "security skills gap" makes mobile app security inaccessible for many development teams. It also presents additional challenges when scaling mobile app development.

As an app scales, mobile development teams introduce greater complexity and functionality. This often happens through the popular and accessible scaling method of adding third-party SDK libraries. But more risk is being introduced to the application by importing these libraries. While these libraries help accelerate development, they also introduce risk, making mobile app protection even more critical.

At this point, mobile app security can no longer be ignored. A DIY approach may seem like a viable option, as it allows teams to tailor security measures to their needs without inflating app size. Open-source tools exist to help optimize the size of the app, but they require experienced security engineers to implement sufficient protections. Developers without security expertise will have difficulty implementing effective protections, leaving the scalability problem unresolved. This means teams are still forced to compromise between performance, security, and UX.

Weaving in multiple layers of code-hardening and obfuscation techniques at the code level provides the robust protection that DIY solutions cannot.

So, what's the best approach?

The answer is to stop thinking about security and performance as separate concerns.

Security and Mobile App Development Should Go Hand in Hand

A winning mobile app security strategy integrates security throughout the development lifecycle. Security must be a consideration at every stage — from writing the code to testing its effectiveness to monitoring threats in real time post-release.

When building your application, efficiency is key to a timely release. But it is also critical to write efficient, secure code. For example, Android apps need to optimize their Java code and resources. Secure coding practices inherently improve efficiency. Removing logging code, eliminating dead code, and code shrinking are examples of a few efficient coding practices that also increase mobile application security. Merging classes and method inlining are other secure coding practices that help shrink the overall size of a mobile application. Mobile apps can apply this to resources in the code as well. Resource shrinking and obfuscation will reduce application size and improve security.

These techniques not only have the potential to reduce application size but also enhance security. With the proper tools, mobile apps can shrink in size by as much as 70% and increase speed by 20%. Incorporating these practices will create an efficient, high performing application that is well protected against malicious threats.

Post-Release - Continuous Threat Monitoring

After publishing your app, continuous threat monitoring will provide ongoing insights and protection by identifying threats to your app in real-time. Security teams monitoring your mobile application receive metadata like app builds, device type, and geographic location with each threat, along with details about each detected threat. Sharing this data with security and development teams gives them the data they need to build proactive protections against new and evolving threats, while helping to mitigate future risks.

Developers and security experts are both essential to building and executing this strategy together. By embedding security into the development process, you can create a high-performing, secure, and scalable app without compromise.

Stop compromising between app performance, user experience, and security. Deliver a superior user experience and a high performing application by incorporating security into your development process. 

Michael Olechna is Product Marketing Manager at Guardsquare

Hot Topics

The Latest

As artificial intelligence (AI) adoption gains momentum, network readiness is emerging as a critical success factor. AI workloads generate unpredictable bursts of traffic, demanding high-speed connectivity that is low latency and lossless. AI adoption will require upgrades and optimizations in data center networks and wide-area networks (WANs). This is prompting enterprise IT teams to rethink, re-architect, and upgrade their data center and WANs to support AI-driven operations ...

Artificial intelligence (AI) is core to observability practices, with some 41% of respondents reporting AI adoption as a core driver of observability, according to the State of Observability for Financial Services and Insurance report from New Relic ...

Application performance monitoring (APM) is a game of catching up — building dashboards, setting thresholds, tuning alerts, and manually correlating metrics to root causes. In the early days, this straightforward model worked as applications were simpler, stacks more predictable, and telemetry was manageable. Today, the landscape has shifted, and more assertive tools are needed ...

Cloud adoption has accelerated, but backup strategies haven't always kept pace. Many organizations continue to rely on backup strategies that were either lifted directly from on-prem environments or use cloud-native tools in limited, DR-focused ways ... Eon uncovered a handful of critical gaps regarding how organizations approach cloud backup. To capture these prevailing winds, we gathered insights from 150+ IT and cloud leaders at the recent Google Cloud Next conference, which we've compiled into the 2025 State of Cloud Data Backup ...

Private clouds are no longer playing catch-up, and public clouds are no longer the default as organizations recalibrate their cloud strategies, according to the Private Cloud Outlook 2025 report from Broadcom. More than half (53%) of survey respondents say private cloud is their top priority for deploying new workloads over the next three years, while 69% are considering workload repatriation from public to private cloud, with one-third having already done so ...

As organizations chase productivity gains from generative AI, teams are overwhelmingly focused on improving delivery speed (45%) over enhancing software quality (13%), according to the Quality Transformation Report from Tricentis ...

Back in March of this year ... MongoDB's stock price took a serious tumble ... In my opinion, it reflects a deeper structural issue in enterprise software economics altogether — vendor lock-in ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 15, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses Do-It-Yourself Network Automation ... 

Zero-day vulnerabilities — security flaws that are exploited before developers even know they exist — pose one of the greatest risks to modern organizations. Recently, such vulnerabilities have been discovered in well-known VPN systems like Ivanti and Fortinet, highlighting just how outdated these legacy technologies have become in defending against fast-evolving cyber threats ... To protect digital assets and remote workers in today's environment, companies need more than patchwork solutions. They need architecture that is secure by design ...

Traditional observability requires users to leap across different platforms or tools for metrics, logs, or traces and related issues manually, which is very time-consuming, so as to reasonably ascertain the root cause. Observability 2.0 fixes this by unifying all telemetry data, logs, metrics, and traces into a single, context-rich pipeline that flows into one smart platform. But this is far from just having a bunch of additional data; this data is actionable, predictive, and tied to revenue realization ...