Here's an eight-letter word, twice as bad as any four-letter word, that no business leader wants to hear: downtime. Today's businesses are far more dependent on IT services than ever, and that's true whether you're talking about internal IT services (like ERP) used to drive strategic operations, or external IT services used to satisfy client and customer demand.
Among the more daunting long-term potential consequences of downtime to the organization are these:
• Lost revenues because business couldn't be transacted. A recent Ponemon study tells us the average cost of downtime for US-based organizations is a stunning $5600/minute.
• Diminished brand strength, because the company is seen as unreliable. The same study suggests the average length of downtime was 90 minutes, leading to roughly $500K of costs per incident.
• Evaporating market share, because unhappy customers go to competitors.
Quite a mess in short. And it's a mess that's rapidly getting bigger. Aberdeen Group found that between 2010 and 2012, the cost per hour of downtime climbed an average of 65%!
Now, all of this is obvious in my own area of application performance monitoring (APM), and while downtime is a problem, there is a bigger issue, more subtle lurking just beneath the surface. When we believe everything is running smoothly but don't know something is wrong, that’s when the most damage happens.
For instance, suppose a BizTalk-based service is up and running in a holistic sense, but operating in a subtly inconsistent manner — difficult to detect — that leads to lost transactions from time to time. By this I mean occasionally lost e-mails, lost database entries, lost purchase orders, etc. Time spent by customers resending email and clients waiting or employees spending time looking for an invoice that has not come through – all of these cause more loss in productivity and reputation over a longer period of time.
According to Pricewaterhouse Coopers, the average organization, spends $120 searching for a lost document and wastes 25 hours recreating each lost document.* But what we don't know is how much productivity is lost through not knowing when a problem exists, searching for a file that is not lost at all. Waiting on document resends, searching for "missing" invoices or customer relationships that need to be repaired due to an apparent miscommunication because information is not flowing smoothly in a system all impact company efficiency and costs.
Application performance, and service uptime, can be affected by myriad factors — some as subtle as a gradual shortage of key computational resources. That's why it's important to find a way to granularly monitor your system. To have control and visibility over the problems that are happening so you can decide which ones to tackle is key.
Over time, I think we're going to see that kind of granular insight play a larger and larger role in APM as a field. But in the meantime, it's important to have a clear view of the information that flows throughout your organization so you can see any problem lurking out of sight.
Ivar Sagemo is CEO of AIMS Innovation.
Related Links:
* DocuSense Blog: How Much are Lost Documents Costing You?
The Latest
Broad proliferation of cloud infrastructure combined with continued support for remote workers is driving increased complexity and visibility challenges for network operations teams, according to new research conducted by Dimensional Research and sponsored by Broadcom ...
New research from ServiceNow and ThoughtLab reveals that less than 30% of banks feel their transformation efforts are meeting evolving customer digital needs. Additionally, 52% say they must revamp their strategy to counter competition from outside the sector. Adapting to these challenges isn't just about staying competitive — it's about staying in business ...
Leaders in the financial services sector are bullish on AI, with 95% of business and IT decision makers saying that AI is a top C-Suite priority, and 96% of respondents believing it provides their business a competitive advantage, according to Riverbed's Global AI and Digital Experience Survey ...
SLOs have long been a staple for DevOps teams to monitor the health of their applications and infrastructure ... Now, as digital trends have shifted, more and more teams are looking to adapt this model for the mobile environment. This, however, is not without its challenges ...
Modernizing IT infrastructure has become essential for organizations striving to remain competitive. This modernization extends beyond merely upgrading hardware or software; it involves strategically leveraging new technologies like AI and cloud computing to enhance operational efficiency, increase data accessibility, and improve the end-user experience ...
AI sure grew fast in popularity, but are AI apps any good? ... If companies are going to keep integrating AI applications into their tech stack at the rate they are, then they need to be aware of AI's limitations. More importantly, they need to evolve their testing regiment ...
If you were lucky, you found out about the massive CrowdStrike/Microsoft outage last July by reading about it over coffee. Those less fortunate were awoken hours earlier by frantic calls from work ... Whether you were directly affected or not, there's an important lesson: all organizations should be conducting in-depth reviews of testing and change management ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 11, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) ...
On average, only 48% of digital initiatives enterprise-wide meet or exceed their business outcome targets according to Gartner's annual global survey of CIOs and technology executives ...
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping industries around the world. From optimizing business processes to unlocking new levels of innovation, AI is a critical driver of success for modern enterprises. As a result, business leaders — from DevOps engineers to CTOs — are under pressure to incorporate AI into their workflows to stay competitive. But the question isn't whether AI should be adopted — it's how ...
