A colleague of mine recently embarked on a journey to explore the capabilities of a well-known legacy observability platform within his Kubernetes environment. He dedicated a week to familiarize himself with the platform, primarily testing out the different features for traces, logs, and infrastructure monitoring. However, his focus shifted when a critical feature needed an early release, diverting his attention away from the observability tool. Unfortunately, without any prior notification or warning, there was no rate limitation to the platform logs collection mechanism. One line of YAML configuration file meant all logs were collected, ingested and stored — with no mention of the projected cost.
Fast forward to the following week, a member of the billing department barged into his office, demanding an explanation for an astronomical observability bill totaling $33,000 for a single month, a staggering contrast to the anticipated $1,700.
This series of events left my work buddy struggling with the size of his mistake, and me questioning whether it really was entirely his fault.
The Complex Landscape of Observability Pricing
Navigating observability pricing models can be compared to solving a perplexing puzzle which includes financial variables and contractual intricacies. Predicting all potential costs in advance becomes an elusive endeavor, exemplified by a recent eye-popping $65 million observability bill.
Avoiding miscalculations as the one that happened to my friend requires continuous monitoring of the monitoring solution. This practice slows down day-to-day operations and long-term growth efforts.
The Challenge of Affordability in Observability
The escalating costs associated with observability represent a vast challenge which is confronting many organizations currently. Particularly in the age of cloud computing, IT leaders and even top executives have come to realize the imperative of reining in their infrastructure budgets, which often spiral out of control.
The proliferation of microservices and distributed architectures has ushered in a flood of data that demands observability. Traditionally, more data translates into higher expenses, accompanied by substantial resource consumption, leading not only to increased costs but also inefficiencies.
Regrettably, most observability tools employ pricing models that defy prediction. While applications generate large amounts of log data, instead of an advantage, this abundance has become a cause for concern. In response, best practices now advocate monitoring "only what you need" or limiting the retention period for collected data to a minimum. This raises two questions: how can you know in advance what you will need, and will limiting the retention period to a minimum make it impossible to correlate with out-of-range historical data.
Enter eBPF: A Game-Changer
eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) has recently emerged as a revolutionary technology that has significantly impacted the Linux kernell. eBPF operates at specific hook points within the kernel, extracting data with minimal overhead, safeguarding the application's resources from excessive consumption. It observes every packet entering or exiting the host, mapping them to processes or containers running on the host, thereby offering granular insights into network traffic.
Moreover, eBPF-powered agents operate independently of the primary application being monitored, ensuring minimal impact on microservice resources.
The combination of visibility depth and stability has made eBPF a groundbreaking technology for cybersecurity companies, and is predicted to have the same effect on observability, for exactly the same reasons.
Hassle-Free Observability
Observability should empower engineers, not bury them in a load of unexpected overheads, data volume surges, and huge subscription bills. The goal of observability platforms should be to guarantee complete protection against such surprises, offering immunity against sudden spikes in data volume and shielding engineers from unfortunate encounters with the billing department.
In conclusion, the journey to achieving efficient and cost-effective observability is full of challenges, but with the right tools and strategies, IT and DevOps leaders can help their organizations emerge from financial uncertainty and empower their engineers to become true observability heroes.
The Latest
Broad proliferation of cloud infrastructure combined with continued support for remote workers is driving increased complexity and visibility challenges for network operations teams, according to new research conducted by Dimensional Research and sponsored by Broadcom ...
New research from ServiceNow and ThoughtLab reveals that less than 30% of banks feel their transformation efforts are meeting evolving customer digital needs. Additionally, 52% say they must revamp their strategy to counter competition from outside the sector. Adapting to these challenges isn't just about staying competitive — it's about staying in business ...
Leaders in the financial services sector are bullish on AI, with 95% of business and IT decision makers saying that AI is a top C-Suite priority, and 96% of respondents believing it provides their business a competitive advantage, according to Riverbed's Global AI and Digital Experience Survey ...
SLOs have long been a staple for DevOps teams to monitor the health of their applications and infrastructure ... Now, as digital trends have shifted, more and more teams are looking to adapt this model for the mobile environment. This, however, is not without its challenges ...
Modernizing IT infrastructure has become essential for organizations striving to remain competitive. This modernization extends beyond merely upgrading hardware or software; it involves strategically leveraging new technologies like AI and cloud computing to enhance operational efficiency, increase data accessibility, and improve the end-user experience ...
AI sure grew fast in popularity, but are AI apps any good? ... If companies are going to keep integrating AI applications into their tech stack at the rate they are, then they need to be aware of AI's limitations. More importantly, they need to evolve their testing regiment ...
If you were lucky, you found out about the massive CrowdStrike/Microsoft outage last July by reading about it over coffee. Those less fortunate were awoken hours earlier by frantic calls from work ... Whether you were directly affected or not, there's an important lesson: all organizations should be conducting in-depth reviews of testing and change management ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 11, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) ...
On average, only 48% of digital initiatives enterprise-wide meet or exceed their business outcome targets according to Gartner's annual global survey of CIOs and technology executives ...
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping industries around the world. From optimizing business processes to unlocking new levels of innovation, AI is a critical driver of success for modern enterprises. As a result, business leaders — from DevOps engineers to CTOs — are under pressure to incorporate AI into their workflows to stay competitive. But the question isn't whether AI should be adopted — it's how ...