EMA recently completed some research looking at the future of IT Service Management (ITSM). We solicited responses to about 270 people overall, with roughly 150 in North America and 100 in Europe (England, Germany, France). The results just came in two weeks ago, and I’d like to share a few highlights with you here.
But first, I should probably start out with one question we didn’t ask — "What is IT Service Management?"
Probably the most frequent industry answer is that ITSM is a "process-based practice designed to align the delivery of IT services with the needs of IT customers and the business IT serves." As a result, many ITSM descriptions spend a great deal of time looking at IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) roots for ITSM, as well as other best practices focused on process. However, this research approached ITSM from a triangle of perspectives. We recognized the importance of technology and organization, as well as process (including dialog and communication).
Beyond that, even before we launched our questionnaire, it became apparent from talking around the industry that IT Service Management is a term that carries a diverse identity — depending on whom you talk to (in role and organization), history and IT-related politics.
On the one hand, ITSM is often linked to old-guard values associated with elaborate, time-consuming processes for managing change and traditional forms of governance that slow down IT resilience in the face of shifting business pressures and demands.
On the other hand, ITSM is often viewed as a dynamic center for expanding IT value, impact and effectiveness in support of broader business requirements — in combination with operations, development and business stakeholders.
Can both views be right? It depends upon whom you ask. But overall, our data tended to favor the second, more positive perspective on ITSM. Here are just a few highlights:
■ Nearly 50% of ITSM organizations were slated for growth, and 35% remain the same size.
■ Improved user experience management and integrated operations for incident, problem and change management led in ITSM strategic priorities.
■ Self-service, project management and CMDB/CMS/ADDM led in functional priorities.
■ 55% viewed big data/analytics for IT as a shared ITSM and operations priority, while 14% viewed ITSM as the lead in analytics.
■ 63% were using mobile in support of ITSM professionals.
■ 50% offered mobile support for ITSM/consumer interactions.
■ Only 20% had no plans to integrate ITSM and DevOps (agile).
■ 43% were actively using ITIL best practices, and of these, 71% viewed it as "essential" or "very important" for their organization.
■ Only 11% had no plans to consolidate ITSM outreach to support enterprise (non-IT) services.
When looking at success rates, we also analyzed the data to contrast how the 16% "extremely successful" performed, versus the 12% combined "somewhat successful" and "largely unsuccessful" respondents. (Most viewed themselves, perhaps a tad optimistically, as "very successful" or simply "successful".)
Compared to that 12% with marginal success rates, extremely successful ITSM initiatives were:
■ 2X more likely to have a CMDB/CMS-related technology deployed
■ Nearly 8X more likely to have ADDM deployed or in plan
■ 2X more likely to be leveraging mobile for ITSM professionals
■ Far more likely to see cloud as a resource for expanding service desk capabilities
■ 20X more likely to view integrated ITSM and agile as "transformative"
■ Far more likely to have an integrated approach to support enterprise services
■ Significantly more likely to value ITIL
■ Much more likely to get an increase in budget
■ Nearly 2.5 times more likely to be slated for growth
These are just a few highlights from our overall success profile.
What this data suggests to me albeit I realize data is always open to interpretation, is several things. For starters, it shows me that our "progressives" are not abandoning ITSM processes and more established ITSM-related technologies such as CMDB systems and application discovery and dependency mapping, but instead are seeking more innovative approaches in their adoptions. The data also reflects a dramatic outreach to support mobile, cloud, agile and enterprise needs — some of which show astonishing uptake from levels just assessed two years ago when we looked at the changing role of the service desk.
What the future will bring is always open to interpretation, as well. But this research seems to indicate a clear trajectory that in many respects is ahead of existing "market thinking." A trajectory that underscores the need to bring process, workflow, automation and dialog between the service desk and the rest of IT into a far more unified whole than in the past. It also suggests that technologies like "big data for IT" — so often referred to as IT operations analytics — belongs as much to this shared mix of capabilities as trouble ticketing and workflow.
Needless to say, the role of culture, leadership and more effective process and dialog is probably an even more important part of ITSM transformation than pure technology adoption, and we looked at many of those issues, as well. So stay tuned. We’ll be doing a webinar with more information on April 7, and hopefully this will whet your appetite for more data and more insights. In the meantime, I welcome the chance to get some of your perspectives and ideas.
Executives in the US and Europe now place broad trust in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning systems, designed to protect organizations from more dynamic pernicious cyber threats, according to Radware's 2017 Executive Application & Network Security Survey ....
While IT service management (ITSM) has too often been viewed by the industry as an area of reactive management with fading process efficiencies and legacy concerns, a new study by Enterprise Management Associates (EMA) reveals that, in many organizations, ITSM is becoming a hub of innovation ...
Cloud is quickly becoming the new normal. The challenge for organizations is that increased cloud usage means increased complexity, often leading to a kind of infrastructure "blind spot." So how do companies break the blind spot and get back on track? ...
Hybrid IT is becoming a standard enterprise model, but there’s no single playbook to get there, according to a new report by Dimension Data entitled The Success Factors for Managing Hybrid IT ...
Any mobile app developer will tell you that one of the greatest challenges in monetizing their apps through video ads isn't finding the right demand or knowing when to run the videos; it's figuring out how to present video ads without slowing down their apps ...
40 percent of UK retail websites experience downtime during seasonal peaks, according to a recent study by Cogeco Peer 1 ...
Predictive analytics is a popular ITOA technology that you can leverage to improve your business by leaps and bounds. Predictive analytics analyzes relationships among various data points to predict behavioral trends, growth opportunities and risks, which can add critical value to your business. Here are a few questions to help you decide if predictive analytics is right for your business ...
Many organizations are at a tipping point, as new technology demands are set to outstrip the skills supply, according to a new Global Digital Transformation Skills Study by Brocade ...
Network capacity is the lifeblood of an enterprise — bandwidth enables business. Getting the most out of the network is a fine balancing act, so it's understandable that enterprises are always hungry for more bandwidth. Two out of three IT and network professionals expect bandwidth usage to increase by up to 50% by the end of 2017. However, bandwidth availability issues could become a thing of the past. We are on the cusp of a great surge of capacity as gigabit speed internet becomes a reality ...
Unified Communications (UC) applications such as VoIP and Video streaming have been around in the enterprise setting now for almost two decades. It's rather remarkable, then, that for all of their business benefits and popularity, UC applications still post so many headaches for network engineers. With that in mind, are there steps that network engineers can and should be taking to make these applications more reliable, and deliver better quality of service to their users? I believe there are, so let's take a look at some tips ...